I hate Sex and the City. I do. It's great cuz it's reflective of society today, at the same time, it points out the glaringly obvious things, things that you never think about, but yet are just so in your face that you can't ignore it.
This one episode struck me to the core over the week, and it was the one about the caste system. Apparently, even today's western society is divided into invisible subclasses, the same as how the Indians are and there are rules to abide by. There will be no mixing between the castes, that the people from the upper class are to be shunned if they were to go out with the people considered from the lower class.
It made me think about the society in which I live. As it is a really small place, nothing is sacred and everyone's business is everyone else's. People actually get paranoid about going to confession because the priest they are confessing to is probably related to the person they did it with.
I go to uni, so most of my friends tend to be from uni. I realised that none of my friends are going out with someone who is not from uni. Everyone's boyfriend is either at uni, or has graduated and working a white-collared job. It's "My boyfriend the lawyer" or "My boyfriend with First class honours". If you said to someone that your boyfriend doesn't have a degree, it matters not whether you love him or not, this is always met with a deafening silence.
In a society where we accept people for being different, for being homosexuals, for doing drugs, for having fetishes, hell, for voting for Bush in the recent election, it is funny that now people are judged for not having an education.
I have talked to several people about the caste system, and I have been receiving some very interesting answers:
Michael thinks that the caste system does exist. He thinks that ultimately human nature is such that if you work so hard to achieve something in your life, it will be unlikely that you will settle for someone who couldn't be bothered. Ultimately, he thinks that people with such different priorities in life are doomed to have a failed relationship. At the same time, he's a yuppie.
Gina believes that as long as the two people love each other, it shouldn't matter. Everyone has their flaws and as long as those flaws do not bug the hell outta you, it's not a problem. Gina's a hopeless romantic.
Natasha thinks love is overrated and everything today is pure bullshit. She believes that marriage is an institution for the hypocrites, if two people love each other so much, why does it have to be official? Why would you need to stand in front of hundreds of people and announce your union? Even if your union is done in City Hall, why bother doing it at all? Does that certificate really matter? Natasha's a cynic.
Sam says that he would go out with a girl who has a more superior standing in society than him but may not date someone who does not have and the drive to improve themselves. His reasoning is that he is very goal orientated and strives for perfection in his daily life. He duly notes though, the line which separates whether or not he would date someone is somewhat blurred. Emotional attachment would play an important role in his decision. Sam is an engineer.
Questions questions and more questions to ponder. Where do you stand on this?
